Your teams are using AutoGen for customer service, LangGraph for data analysis, and CrewAI for content creation. Each framework delivers impressive results individually. But nobody's tracking the hidden costs of managing this fragmentation.
Based on our analysis of enterprise AI deployments, companies are spending 40-60% of their AI budget on integration and maintenance—not on building new capabilities.
Consider a mid-sized enterprise with four AI initiatives:
| Initiative | Framework | Initial Cost | Annual Maintenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer Service | AutoGen | $50,000 | $120,000 |
| Data Analysis | LangGraph | $75,000 | $180,000 |
| Content Creation | CrewAI | $40,000 | $100,000 |
| Document Processing | Custom | $60,000 | $150,000 |
Total Initial Investment: $225,000
Annual Maintenance: $550,000
The maintenance cost is 2.4x the initial investment—and 60% of that maintenance is integration overhead, not value-added work.
Use this quick assessment:
Formula: Frameworks × (Frameworks-1) / 2 × 300 hours × $175/hour
For 4 frameworks: 4 × 3 / 2 × 300 × $175 = $315,000 in integration costs alone.
The framework wars will continue. AutoGen will release new features. LangGraph will improve performance. CrewAI will add new capabilities.
But the companies that win won't be those with the best individual frameworks—they'll be those with the most elegant orchestration.
Stop asking "Which framework should we use next?" and start asking "How will we orchestrate everything we're already using?"
In 2026, orchestration isn't optional—it's the difference between AI leaders and AI laggards.